“To understand the origin of evil, one must first go back to the beginning”
Yes, indeed. You then question how the Raelians are silent, or shushed. This “movement” provides a fascinating study of human capabilities and imagination. Read more about it below and share your views with us if you will. I would also suggest googling Eric Von Daniken. Things to tickle your brain - that’s how I perceive them.
HUMAN SCIENTISTS FROM ANOTHER PLANET CREATED ALL LIFE ON EARTH USING DNA.
Traces of this epic masterpiece of creation can be found in all religious writings and traditions. It is to them that Moses, Jesus, Buddha and Mohammed referred. It is now time to welcome them.
On the 13th of December 1973, French journalist Rael was contacted by a visitor from another planet, and asked to establish an Embassy to welcome these people back to Earth.
The extra-terrestrial human being was a little over four feet tall, had long dark hair, almond shaped eyes, olive skin, and exuded harmony and humor. Rael recently described him by saying quite simply, “If he were to walk down a street in Japan, he would not even be noticed.” In other words, they look like us, and we look like them. In fact, we were created “in their image” as explained in the Bible.
He told Rael that:
“We were the ones who designed all life on earth”
“You mistook us for gods”
“We were at the origin of your main religions”
“Now that you are mature enough to understand this,we would like to enter official contact through an embassy”THE MESSAGES
The messages dictated to Rael explain that life on Earth is not the result of random evolution, nor the work of a supernatural ‘God’. It is a deliberate creation, using DNA, by a scientifically advanced people who made human beings literally “in their image” — what one can call “scientific creationism.” References to these scientists and their work, as well as to their symbol of infinity, can be found in the ancient texts of many cultures. For example, in Genesis, the Biblical account of Creation, the word “Elohim” has been mistranslated as the singular word “God”, but it is actually a plural word which means “those who came from the sky”, and the singular is “Eloha” (also known as “Allah”). Indigenous cultures all over the world remember these “gods” who came from the sky, including natives of Africa (Dogon, Twa, etc.), America, Asia, Australia, and Europe.
Leaving our humanity to progress by itself, the Elohim nevertheless maintained contact with us via prophets including Buddha, Moses, Mohammed, etc., all specially chosen and educated by them. The role of the prophets was to progressively educate humanity through the Messages they taught, each adapted to the culture and level of understanding at the time. They were also to leave traces of the Elohim so that we would be able to recognize them as our Creators and fellow human beings when we had advanced enough scientifically to understand them. Jesus, whose father was an Eloha, was given the task of spreading these messages throughout the world in preparation for this crucial time in which we are now privileged to live: the predicted Age Of Revelation.
Although not supported by evidence (or do they?) their story seems a bit more plausible than some other religions….<br /><br /><i>Leaving our humanity to progress by itself, the Elohim nevertheless
maintained contact with us via prophets including Buddha, Moses,
Mohammed, etc., all specially chosen and educated by them. The role of
the prophets was to progressively educate humanity through the Messages
they taught, each adapted to the culture and level of understanding at
the time.</i><br />Although, I’d be skeptic to such claims; If religions were really not made-up on this earth, it makes sense that there was an unholy intervention rather than the unscientific other statements…<br /><br />Guess I heard similar stories to "scientific creationism" but never had one such credible source: Thanks for sharing.<br />
I remember the TV series of Von Daniken during the late 70s; it was impressive for a child, especially because one could not find the diving line between factuality and the plot of narratives. I have recently heard that these simplified versions of french Enlightenment managed to find an audience in Jordan and that a circle of believers in theological and mystified science is formed in Amman. Well, I somehow disagree with <em>Devil’s Mind </em>concerning the issue of credibility. If i am searching for credibility, in a rational way, i should not enter the religious domain at all, just keep scientific, with no "Days of Revelation" and "Days of Revealed Truth". If I go for a system of morals and genuine social behaviour, then I try to apply honestly well tested cultural systems encoded in religions. If i mix the two, I end up with religious hybrids full of Wreth, Hatred, Guilt, like the ones we experience for the last couple of millenia. We already have enough of them, no need for more, really.
to clear the airwith Vas: credibility != factualness<br />Credibility is having supporting <i>published</i> info to support your claims; But something being publised doesnt imply that it is nessarily true!<br />
<p>To me, credibility is relative. For example, those Raelians believe Rael’s tale of his encounter with the extraterrestrial human being because at some point of their lives they were ready to accept such a narrative. A kid believes what his father tells him because this is how he is programmed, raised, etc. It is not because Rael or the kid’s father provided evidence of what they say.</p>
<p>To say that credibility can only be attained via, say, being published in a renowned scientific journal, is an error. Systems of belief have largely relied on "credible" information, which translates in this case to tangible proof of their "correctness", and then on "incredible" information - things we ourselves have not seen like the process of creation. </p>
You know: If you want to know about Christianity your read the bible, or about Islam the Qura’n rather than what the media is trying to convey it; If you want to know about Satanism your read Lavey’s work, rather than listen to what your friend has to say about them.<br /><br />So all im saying, is that we have a place that speaks about scientific creationism, rather than relying to unrelated sources… Thats what I meant!<br /><br /><i><span class="commentBody"><span id="comment-2184">Systems of belief
have largely relied on "credible" information, which translates in this
case to tangible proof of their "correctness", and then on "incredible"
information - things we ourselves have not seen like the process of
creation.</i><br />This is sadly a big flaw!! Sometimes, people say the truth to gain your trust, and once they get that trust, they start to (subtly) introduce misinformation… One should be wary of who they trust!<br /></span></span>