BOO Bush
Not only is the man several light years away from what a diplomat should be, he has also proven to most sane Americans that he is indeed on a “crusade” - to ruin their reputation abroad. I received the following interesting bit of information in an e-mail from my friend Yoda. This was taken from Time.com, published under “The Five Key Mistakes of Bush’s Middle East Policy”. I do not know the exact date of it:
1. Bush ignored the Palestinians.
Up until the week that Bill Clinton left office in January 2001,
Israeli and Palestinian negotiators were still trying to work out an
ambitious end-of-conflict agreement. True, Palestinian leader Yasser
Arafat had unleashed an intifadeh, and the Israelis were on the verge
of electing Ariel Sharon — an avowed enemy of the Oslo peace process —
as prime minister, but the two sides were still talking. When Bush
became president, he ended crucial American mediation, repudiated
Arafat and backed Sharon, who proceeded to expand Israeli settlements
in the occupied West Bank. With the conflict becoming bloodier than
ever, Arafat died, and Hamas, the fundamentalist party that adamantly
refuses to even recognize Israel, much less negotiate with it, ousted
the late Palestinian leader’s party from power. Besides angering Arab
opinion, the lack of an Arab-Israeli peace process that would also
address Israel’s occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights has encouraged
mischief-making by Damascus, which is suspected of aiding anti-U.S.
insurgents in Iraq and committing political assassinations in Lebanon.2. Bush invaded Iraq.
After 9/11, Bush became convinced that Saddam Hussein was seeking
nuclear weapons and represented a mortal threat to the West. He also
came to believe that ousting Saddam would turn Iraq into a democracy
that would become the model for the rest of the Arab world. Saddam
turned out not to have nuclear weapons, and Iraq turned out to be more
prone to civil war than democracy. It runs the risk of becoming a
failed state from which terrorists run global operations, and/or
breaking into ethnic mini-states that inspire secessionist trouble
throughout the region.3. Bush misjudged Iran.
Just after Bush became president, Iranians reelected moderate
President Mohammed Khatami, who had reached out to the U.S. and called
for a “dialogue of civilizations.” Bush not only refused to extend the
olive branch cautiously offered by the Clinton Administration, he
declared Iran part of an “axis of evil.” Khatami left office under
fire for the failure of his conciliatory approach, to be replaced by
hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who proceeded to promote
Iran’s nuclear ambitions and call for Israel to be wiped off the map.
Despite Bush’s tough talk against Iran, the Iraq war has dramatically
expanded Iran’s influence in the country. To make matters worse,
Iran’s Lebanese ally, Hizballah, withstood Israel’s month-long
onslaught last summer and is poised to topple the U.S.-backed Lebanese
government.4. Bush hurt Israel.
If protecting Israel had been a key goal of the Administration’s
policies, it is hard to see how they have helped make the Jewish State
better off today. Having gotten rid of Arafat, they have instead to
face Hamas. And continuous rocket attacks from Gaza have highlighted
the limits of what Israel can achieve through its plans to
unilaterally redraw its borders. The confrontation in Lebanon over the
summer and the messy engagement in Gaza also highlight the limits on
the deterrent capacity of Israel’s military advantages. Spreading
instability in the region is not in Israel’s long-term interests; nor
is a nuclear Iran.5. Bush alienated Muslims.
It was an honest misstep, but the problem began when Bush promised to
wage a “crusade” against al-Qaeda after September 11, effectively
equating his war on terrorism with an earlier Christian invasion of
the Middle East that remains etched in the collective memory of
Muslims. Since then, the Bush Administration’s involvement in or
perceived support of military campaigns against Iraqis, Palestinians
and Lebanese heightened Muslim anger at the U.S. and undermined the
political position of moderate, pro-American Arabs, including old U.S.
allies like Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and King Abdullah of
Saudi Arabia — and, of course, King Abdullah II of Jordan, the host of
Bush’s Middle East visit this week.
I am much less than thrilled to receive Bush Jr. in Amman. Some argue that this step is an admission of some sort that his administration’s policies in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East have not been successful and that, as such, this trip should be celebrated. Well think again, “I say not unto thee, ‘Until seven times; but until seventy times seven.’ ”
Since he’s in the vicinity, why doesn’t he pop up in Abu Ghraib and see how the torture dogs are doing?
What I dislike the most about this visit are the heightened security measures. Scaring people out of their wits by stationing police and helmet-wearing, machine-gun-bearing army people all over Amman is not a healthy sign. Maybe Jordanians and the American Embassy alike could learn something from James Bond and work undercover for once and not make all this uncalled-for fuss. It’s irritating and it certainly is not stylish anymore.
Honestly though, who would be bothered to check if the person in that 74′ Toyota at the traffic light is George W. Bush?
I had intended for this post to have more “weight” but because I am a good girl I will take my parents’ advice and not post anything too “out there”. I will keep the explosives for my research papers, where I know who my audience is.
P.S: The other day I was browsing bumper sticker designs and one read: “Clinton screwed an intern. Bush screwed us all.”
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Related Posts
- MichaelMoore.com
- Semitic is a Language Group, Not a Racial or Ethnic Group
- DC Stream of Consciousness
- Moderates no more?
- Someone’s Independence Is Someone Else’s Nakba

November 30th, 2006 at 3:12 pm
i don’t think they were just mistakes.. i think this was what bush came for… <br />thank you for this post<br />
November 30th, 2006 at 4:47 pm
I’ll address each point one-by-one:<br /><br />1. I respond to this one under 4.<br /><br />2. I agree. Attempting to bring democracy to any Islamic country is unlikely to succeed. Islam comes with its own inherent legal code and is difficult to extricate from the political environment of any country where a significant Muslim population exists. Islam and democracy simply aren’t compatible and only a dramatic and deep secularization of Muslim countries could conceivably allow for democracy to thrive. (Ironically, if Bush wanted to spread democracy, an authentic, old-fashioned "Crusade" would have been a more successful venture. But, of course, that would be inhumane…)<br /><br />On the other hand, I can’t entirely blame Bush for the bloodshed. That would be too easy. I also have to hold the Iraqis responsible for being as uncivilized as they are. There is a lot of hatred between the Sunnis and the Shia in Iraq; but
Bush and his neo-con pals should have expected no better from an
Islamic country. There are also bad actors in the neighborhood who are encouraging the strife. The Arab world demonstrates once again why it cannot take the lead in resolving conflicts like Darfur; namely, it can’t help but mess things up closer to home.<br /><br />3. Khatamei had no real power (neither does Ahmadinejad) over the development of US-Iranian relations; Khamanei holds all the cards in Iran and has never shown any indication of wishing to get friendly with the "Great Satan." Besides, since the nuclear crises with Iran has developed, it is quite clear that Khatamei isn’t as much of a moderate as we had hoped. (The "moderate" Rafsanjani is also a joke; the guy has openly discussed nuking Israel in the past, reportedly was a something of a thug prior to becoming a presidential candidate, and he comes across as an arrogant elitist to many Iranians.) In any event, the primary reason Ahmadinejad came to power was because of Iran’s troubled economy, not because of Bush.<br /><br />4. I doubt Bush could have done much to alter the course of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. No president has had much luck in that area. Israel has made many missteps. Olmert is a weak hand. Even Sharon made a mistake in withdrawing from Gaza, that is now abundantly clear. Bush almost certainly could not have prevented Hamas from gaining power after Arafat died. The flagrant corruption of Fatah all but assured that. (Then again, maybe Bush could have talked Suha into giving back a share of the billions of dollars her husband stole. Lol.) In any event, the Palestinians don’t deserve a state. There was a time when I felt the Israelis and Palestinians might come to some sort of an agreement back in the 90’s. I’ve lost all hope of that. It is clear that the Israelis could appease the Palestinians until they’re blue in the face. It would only make things worse. The more autonomy Palestinians have received, the worse the terrorism has gotten. The worst mistake Israel ever made was allowing Arafat back from Tunisia. Oslo was the next worst mistake they made.<br /><br />5. But does alienating Muslims even matter? Not if this new study is any indication:<br /><br />http://www.parapundit.com/archives/003924.html<br />
November 30th, 2006 at 5:03 pm
You noticed me wearing my Bush mask while sitting at a stoplight in my ‘74 Toyota? Crap, my cover is blown!
November 30th, 2006 at 11:03 pm
<p>George Walker Bush is an embarassment to his country, and should be, if he isn’t already, an embarassment to even his closest family members.</p>
<p>This man has repeatedly shown that he hasn’t a single clue about what the office of President of the United States entails, he also has quite clearly shown that he has no understanding of the basic fundamentals of the United States Constitution - a document he TWICE swore with his hand upon a Bible (Allegedly his "holy book") to "Protect and defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic" - a document he is said to have called a "G** damned piece of paper" - a document he has violated and attempted to eviscerate during his entire ill-gotten term of office.</p>
<p>George Walker Bush knew quite well that Saddam Hussein had no "Weapons of Mass Destruction", nor any viable nuclear weapons program, and that there was NO connection between Al Queda and Saddam Hussein - but George Walker Bush was determined to invade Iraq on whatever flimsy excuse he could possibly find from his first day in office, and Osama Bin Laden handed him the excuse wrapped in gold paper and tied with a lovely silver bow on 9/11/01.</p>
<p>Thankfully, now that there will be a Democratic majority in both houses of congress in late January, this man with all the blood of American and Iraqi soldiers, and innocent Iraqi men, women and children will become answerable to the congressional oversight that he has thus far avoided due to our own "sectarian" squabbles here in the USA.</p>
<p>I apologize to you, Tololy, for the inconveniences and unpleasantness that George Walker Bush’s presence in your country is causing you and your fellow Jordanians. Unfortunately, George Walker Bush has created such an enormous amount of ill-will in the world that there is a substantial possibility that someone would try to assassinate him.</p>
<p>Pray for us please, Tololy, that during the next 2 years a candidate emerges who can find a way to encourage peace in all places. That the extremists and violence-mongers on both sides of our ocean can become less than the buzzing of a gnat, and that the voices of sanity, of reason, of sensibilty, are once again the voices that are heard worldwide.</p>
<p></p>
December 1st, 2006 at 5:50 am
I say we go back to referring to Bush by the nickname his critics gave him when he was governor of Texas–"Shrub"
December 1st, 2006 at 11:59 am
<p>Well,Bush has been good to Jordan !! There’s a free trade agreement,annual economic and military aid to Jordan.</p>
<p>Here is what <strong>U. S. Ambassador David Hale</strong> said on the on the 5th Anniversary of the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks, U.S. Ambassador’s Residence, Amman, September 11, 2006:</p>
<p>"Thank you all for coming today. I thank in particular our distinguished Jordanian guests who have joined me, General Khaled Al Sarairah, the Chairman of the Jordan Armed Forces Staff, Lt General Mohammad Al Etan, who is Commander of the Public Security Directorate, Major General Awwad Saleem Al Masaid, the Chief of Civil Defense, General Jamal Al Shawabkeh, the Chief of the Counter Terrorism Force in the Jordan Armed Forces, and Mr. Karim Al Masri, the Acting Chief of Protocol at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Welcome to all of you.<br /><br />This is a poignant moment for all Americans but it’s also a poignant moment for Jordanians and particularly for our Jordanian staff, who as I was walking through this building today reminded me that it was five years ago as they were greeting newly arrived Ambassador Skip Gnehm when they got news of the attacks on 9/11. So all of us, I think today in particular, remember those moments.A year ago, we were joined by representatives of the families of Jordanian victims of the attacks on 9/11, and they joined me in planting an olive tree in the back garden. Olive trees as you know are symbols of many things, including symbols of life, and we thought it was appropriate in a way to contrast what we’re doing with the acts of terrorists who of course hold life in pure contempt. I’m happy to report that that tree is flourishing. But in addition to celebrating life and commemorating the victims of 9/11, this is also time to speak of our resolve. And this year as I said we are honored by the presence of the leaders of Jordan’s fight, and in our common fight, against terrorism. We are truly partners in the global effort to defeat the forces of terrorism who target us — whether Jordanians or Americans or other peace loving people — because we are voices for moderation, we are voices for tolerance, we are voices for co-existence, and we are voices for peace. <br />full speech:</p>
<p><a href="http://amman.usembassy.gov/User/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsId=1184">http://amman.usembassy.gov/User/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsId=1184</a></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
December 2nd, 2006 at 1:56 am
Tommy, I am positive you know this already but I will say it all the same, your comment reeks of islamophobia. I now understand the type of mentality that chose Bush for president.
December 4th, 2006 at 11:10 am
Tololy: <br /><br />I think his comment is really more "racist" than "Islamophobic," even though branding things as "Islamophobic" has enjoyed a certain trendy currency in recent months.<br /><br />On the other hand the second part of your comment is, to be quite frank, absurd and completely beneath you.<br />