http://www.tololy.com/2008/05/08/quid-pro-quo/ Tag free. No labels. Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://www.tololy.com/2008/05/08/quid-pro-quo/#comment-52144 a.rehman Mon, 12 May 2008 02:14:54 +0000 http://www.tololy.com/?p=1084#comment-52144 A crime is a crime is a crime. Noone should be above the rational law. And when you corner anyone that they feel helpless they are bound to strime back sometime. The girl neede not kill her family if she could have other recourse, 15 yrs is fair enough under the circumstances The honour law is bound to increase violence on women part after we saw the increase on the men part because the women knowing their fate is sealed may deliver the first strike too. We  will likely see more voilence perpetrated by both genders. A crime is a crime is a crime. Noone should be above the rational law. And when you corner anyone that they feel helpless they are bound to strime back sometime. The girl neede not kill her family if she could have other recourse, 15 yrs is fair enough under the circumstances The honour law is bound to increase violence on women part after we saw the increase on the men part because the women knowing their fate is sealed may deliver the first strike too. We  will likely see more voilence perpetrated by both genders.

]]> http://www.tololy.com/2008/05/08/quid-pro-quo/#comment-51566 Mohanned Thu, 08 May 2008 17:22:56 +0000 http://www.tololy.com/?p=1084#comment-51566 So does this give her an execuse to "harm" or mistakingly kill them? So does this give her an execuse to “harm” or mistakingly kill them?

]]>